Governance

Credibility
by design.

The governance structure of Collective Legacy is not an administrative formality. It is the source of the program's credibility — and the reason corporate partners can be certain that their involvement cannot compromise artistic integrity.

01

Legal Structure

Non-profit structure.
Independent ownership.

The Collective Legacy collection is held by a dedicated non-profit structure under Asociația Kontakt, a registered cultural association operating under Romanian law. The collection is managed by an independent supervisory board with a publicly stated mandate.

Annual external financial reporting is required under OG 26/2000, ensuring transparency and accountability to public and partner audiences. All accounts are independently audited.

The non-profit structure is designed to ensure that the collection cannot be privatised, dissolved for financial gain, or transferred to a commercial entity. It is a permanent public cultural infrastructure, governed privately.

Legal & Structural Framework

Legal entity

Dedicated non-profit structure under Asociația Kontakt

Governing framework

Romanian non-profit law · OG 26/2000

Reporting

Annual external financial reporting · independent audit

Collection ownership

Held by non-profit · not transferable to commercial entity

Data compliance

GDPR-compliant patron and artist data management

02

Independent Supervisory Board

Independent authority.
No exceptions.

The supervisory board is the highest governing authority of Collective Legacy. Its members are drawn from the professional curatorial, critical, and academic communities. No board member may have a financial relationship with any corporate partner.

The board oversees collection strategy, acquisition policy, ethical compliance, and institutional direction. It does not intervene in individual acquisition decisions — that authority rests with the independent jury.

Board mandates are limited in duration and rotate on a staggered schedule, preventing any individual or faction from establishing long-term institutional control.

Board composition

Curators, critics, cultural historians, legal advisors, and independent institutional specialists.

Mandate duration

Limited terms with staggered rotation. No permanent positions.

Independence requirement

No financial relationship permitted with any corporate partner of the program.

Scope of authority

Collection strategy, policy, and compliance oversight. Not individual acquisition decisions.

03

Ethics Policy & Conflict of Interest

Written rules.
Declared interests.

A written ethics policy governs all acquisition decisions. It is published and available to all partners, board members, and the public. The policy defines prohibited behaviours, sets out conflict-of-interest declaration requirements, and specifies the consequences of violations.

All board members and jury members are required to file a signed conflict-of-interest declaration before each acquisition cycle. Any undeclared interest that subsequently emerges triggers a mandatory review process. The ethics policy is reviewed annually by the supervisory board.

Declaration requirement

All board and jury members must declare conflicts of interest before each acquisition cycle, in writing.

Rotational jury

Jury membership rotates across cycles to prevent capture. Written ethics policy governs all acquisitions.

Annual policy review

The ethics policy is reviewed annually by the supervisory board and updated to reflect any gaps identified in practice.

The Non-Interventionist Partner Principle

Partners participate
without interference.

The value of participation in Collective Legacy depends entirely on the program's artistic credibility. That credibility is only possible if corporate partners have no influence whatsoever over acquisition decisions.

This is not a limitation on partners — it is the condition that makes their association valuable. A collection shaped by commercial interests is not a cultural archive. It is a marketing asset.

Partner Involvement — What Is Permitted

Strategic oversight forums and roundtables

Access to cultural program (previews, studio visits)

Founding recognition and institutional communication

Input on which artists are selected or rejected

Influence on acquisition criteria or jury composition

Any editorial control over curatorial or archival decisions